Here is the wake-up call for all AMERICA!
Our republic has been hijacked by a foreign influence. We woke up to this on May 29th, 2009 when the Financial Times of London published an article covering a special Congressional vote and action on the President Obamas Middle-East policies. The results was given to President as a Conressional non-binding Advisory. The peculiar issue here is that not even one of the US news sources TV or paper has mentioned this so far.
The AIPAC has been long rumored to be a major power in the US politics. AIPAC is a foreign lobby organization allowed to work with US Congress. It's is well understood on the streets of America that to get elected into US Congress one must get the blessing from the AIPAC. This AIPAC represents the interests of a foreign country, that are often not the same as the interests of the USA!
The table below shows the racial composition of the 100th US Congress. There are some oddities like why do the Blacks, Hispanics, Asians and Natives have slightly less than 17% of the seats in the House and only 5% of the seats in Senate when they together represent 37% of the US population, and why do the Jews with their share of about 1% of the US population hold 7% of the seats in the Hoiuse and 14% of the seats in the Senate? Unfortunately the information of the current Congress in similar fashion is not easily available - why not?
Racial Composition of the 110th Congress (Representatives Total: House =435; Senate = 100) White Black Hispanic Asian Jewish / Zionists (=Khazars) Native American
(FT: vote on May 29, 2009) Congress still favors Israel and her outpost extensions on Palestininan lands For the Israeli Regime For Palestinins / Absent
The outcome of the voting above is against all common sense, UN resolutions, and against every global opinion poll in every country including Israel. Then both the Senate and the House voted the exacting 76% for and 24% against the Israel's position to have free hands to expand settlement to Palestinian lands. The alarming outcome is that the Israeli lobby has apparently, in theory, the votes to change the US Conctitution. The President's Veto would be overruled and the 317 million other US citizens out of 320 million could do nothing to prevent it. We know that those 329 memebers of the House and 76 Members of the Senate are receiving a comfortable support from AIPAC and/or it's members at large.
Before doing too much Jew bashing one must be aware that the so called Jewsih camp is actually three camps, one that consists of the original Jews with ethnic connection to the old Israel lands and everything Jewish; the second group are descendants of warrior tribes who converted themselves to Judaism as Ashkenazi Jews or Zionists for political reasons to survive between the Islam and Christianity during the first millennium in the plains of Khazaria between the upper parts of Black Sea and the Caspian Sea with ambitions reaching outside their borders; the third and most powerful groups are the desecendats of the ruling class from whatever is left from Khazars. This group still holds their warrior time beliefs of being superior over all other people on the planet and are the ones who seized the opportunity when the State of Israel was established or actually planned it all (Balfour Declaration) and are currently running the State of Israel and it's puppetsa and policies around the globe.
Today the global mix of the 11 million Jews is reportedly 10% of ethnic Jews and 90% Zionists or Khazars. These two groups appear to have strong opinions from each others and prefer some distance between them though they still act together.
How far has the Zionist control over the USA progressed? Jusr read the following on record that is related to the UN resolution to condemn Israels attack against the people of Gaza Strip in December 2008. The three following quotes are from the at the time Prime Minister Mr. Olmert’s speech. According to Olmert, he called the White House upon hearing of the upcoming UN Security Council resolution: "I said, Get me President Bush on the phone. They said he was in the middle of giving a speech in Philadelphia. I said I didn't care: I need to talk to him now. He (the President) got off the podium and spoke to me," Olmert said, according to multiple media reports. As a result of his conversation with President Bush, Olmert claimed, "the president called Rice and forced her to abstain from voting on the measure, which she herself had helped author. He gave an order to the secretary of state and she did not vote in favor of it, a resolution she cooked up, phrased, organized, and maneuvered for. She was left pretty shamed and abstained on a resolution she arranged."
Preseident Obama is less powerful than it looks. The Jewish vote is in power position in almost anything in the Congress. The answer to the question, "Has some group really control over the USA" is a sound yes - the Congress of the USA is under the Zionist rule! It remains to be seen how long it takes for the American people to wake up! Regardless of the apparent financial power of the Zionists, the real musscle and power still resides in the hands of the physical and able bodies. The money was the reason why Louis XIV stated: "who has most money will always win the war". His philosophy worked well at the time of scarity, if his army appeared to be weaker he simply bought the soldiers of the opposing army. When the enemy generals woke up in the morning of the decisive battle they had nothing substantial any more to fight this battle.
The Zionsists have learned this all from Karl Marx. They are still hard headed and missing the lesson we can learn from the fate of descendats of Louis XIV in the hands of ordinary Parisians, the power of the peasants in Russia, and the power of the ordinary people both in Poland (the newsmedia pretends that "nothing" happened in Poland), and again the same way power of the ordinary people in Germany.
The representation disparity in Congress can be solved even in a two party system. We need to introduce one minor change in the ballots and then to count the votes a little differently - all is then simple math. We add the race of each candidate next to his/her name. Not complex nor secret as we all are supposed to know that anyhow.
Then we count the votes two ways: first by the race and then by the candidates, that's all what we need.
Let's take the State "X" that sends 10 members to House of Represenatatives in Washington. We make this example simple by assuming we a total of 100 votes were cast and the tabilated results are shown below (R = republicans, D = democrats):
Thats all to it. The end result is the same 50/50 balance between the republicans and Democrates but the racial distribution is now much closer to the existing population base in the State "X". With this voting in the House will reflect more precisely the opinion of the State "X". With this new composition in the House the Racial tensions especially in the South will start disappearing as the people at large will be represented in Washington by their own people and not by the Majority.
The same process will be used in every election in the State "X". There is no more need to redraw the voting districts as that will no more have any impact to the outcome.
Stopping the democratic perocess is much simpler than ever thought and is used continuously by the most powerfull lobby organizations to get their message to sink to the heads "green" or otherwise timid representatives that are afraid of their re-election.
When Russia got rid of communism and started disintegrating thanks to the realities on ground and the help from the Western hired hands, a large number of people in the "right street corners" at the "right moment" took advantage and in the name of privatisation they simp[ly "took" large chuncks of State property to their own hands at nominal prices. They were the ones who recognized what must be done and how to do it the "capitalistic" way. With the Western advisers all kind of Western help was immediately available to complete these deals.
This all turned to a mosta blatant robbery of the Sate property. However, like with all robberies the new orners did not really have it in their heads nor did they realize how much financial help they would need in the situations like we live today. Many of them tried to again take it all out from the "hives" of the workers but times had changed since Stalin and communism - the people disgareed. This is coming now statring to seep slowly to the surface one case at the time. The foreign backers who worked with these robbers earlier have become more careful as the leadership of the country is no more that innocent and ignorant in capitalism as it was just fifteen years ago. We know the Mr.Here is one example how it plays out today...
The problem is that more and more people are spreading false rumors and reportedly carrying guns closer and closer to areas where the President is speaking or visiting.